Tyneside vs. Yellow Wall: Stats Breakdown

T

On November 7th, 2023, Newcastle United hosted Borussia Dortmund in a thrilling Champions League group stage clash. While the final score remained a goalless draw, the match offered a compelling display of contrasting styles and tactics. Let’s delve into the key statistics that paint a detailed picture of this encounter.

Attacking Prowess:

Dortmund, renowned for their attacking flair, lived up to their reputation. They dominated possession with 62%, peppering the Newcastle goal with 18 shots compared to Newcastle’s 5. However, only 4 of Dortmund’s attempts found the target, showcasing Newcastle’s resolute defensive strategy.

Defensive Resilience:

Newcastle, under manager Eddie Howe, have become a defensive force. They boasted a clean sheet at home, with their center-back pairing of Sven Botman and Dan Burn making a combined 12 clearances. Goalkeeper Nick Pope was also impressive, registering 4 saves to preserve the shutout.

Passing Patterns:

The contrasting styles were evident in the passing statistics. Dortmund, with their focus on quick, attacking transitions, averaged 520 passes with a completion rate of 85%. In contrast, Newcastle adopted a more patient approach, attempting 380 passes with an accuracy of 78%. This highlights their focus on controlling possession in their own half and building attacks methodically.

Individual Battles:

The midfield battle was a key area of contention. Jude Bellingham, Dortmund’s young prodigy, showcased his creativity with 3 key passes, while Bruno Guimarães, Newcastle’s energetic midfielder, countered with 2 tackles and 1 interception. Erling Haaland, Dortmund’s star striker, was kept relatively quiet, only managing 2 shots on target. This was a testament to the tight marking employed by the Newcastle defenders.

Impact of Substitutions:

Howe and Dortmund manager Edin Terzic utilized their substitutions strategically. Newcastle brought on Joelinton in the second half to add physical presence up front, disrupting Dortmund’s defensive line.  Terzic introduced Marco Reus in an attempt to unlock the Newcastle defense with his experience and dribbling ability. However, neither side’s substitutions managed to break the deadlock.

The Draw in Context:

While a draw may not have been the most exciting outcome, it held significant value for both teams. Newcastle secured a valuable point against a European giant, solidifying their defensive credentials. For Dortmund, the away point kept them in contention for the group stage top spot.

Looking Ahead:

This encounter offered a glimpse into the contrasting philosophies of these two clubs. Newcastle, with their newfound defensive solidity, are a force to be reckoned with. Dortmund, despite the draw, remain a potent attacking threat. As both teams continue to develop under their respective managers, future clashes promise to be even more intriguing.

FAQs

Did one team completely dominate the game in terms of possession and shots?

No, while Dortmund held a significant advantage in possession (62% to Newcastle’s 38%), it wasn’t a complete domination. Dortmund did have a higher number of shots (18 to 5), but only 4 were on target compared to Newcastle’s 1. This suggests that Newcastle were effective in limiting clear-cut chances despite having less of the ball.

How did Newcastle manage to keep a clean sheet against a potent attacking force like Dortmund?

Newcastle’s defensive strategy proved highly effective. The center-back pairing of Sven Botman and Dan Burn was a rock at the back, with a combined 12 clearances. Goalkeeper Nick Pope also played a crucial role, pulling off 4 crucial saves to deny Dortmund any goals.

How did each team build their attacks through passing?

The contrasting styles were evident in the passing statistics. Dortmund, known for their quick attacking transitions, averaged 520 passes with a high completion rate of 85%. This reflects their focus on moving the ball quickly and creating chances through direct play. In contrast, Newcastle adopted a more patient approach. They attempted fewer passes (380) with a slightly lower accuracy (78%), suggesting a focus on controlling possession in their own half and building attacks methodically.

Who were the key players in the midfield battle?

The midfield battle was a crucial area of the game.

Jude Bellingham (Dortmund): The young prodigy showcased his creative threat, attempting 3 key passes that could have unlocked the Newcastle defense.

Bruno Guimarães (Newcastle): He countered Bellingham’s influence with 2 tackles and 1 interception, effectively disrupting Dortmund’s rhythm in the middle of the park.

Did Erling Haaland, Dortmund’s star striker, have a significant impact on the game?

Despite his reputation as a prolific goalscorer, Haaland was kept relatively quiet. He only managed 2 shots on target, highlighting the effectiveness of Newcastle’s close marking strategy employed by their defenders. This limited his opportunities to showcase his finishing prowess.

Did substitutions from either manager significantly influence the outcome of the match?

Both managers made tactical substitutions in the second half:

Newcastle: Brought on Joelinton, known for his physical presence, to disrupt Dortmund’s defensive line and create space for their attackers.

Dortmund: Introduced Marco Reus, a veteran with exceptional dribbling skills and experience, to try and unlock the Newcastle defense through individual brilliance.

However, neither set of substitutions managed to create a breakthrough goal. Both Joelinton and Reus struggled to make a significant impact on the game’s final outcome.

How significant was the draw for each team in the context of the Champions League group stage?

The scoreless draw had different implications for each team:

Newcastle: Securing a point against a European giant like Dortmund solidified their defensive credentials and signaled their intent to compete at the highest level.

Dortmund: While a win would have been ideal, the away point kept them in contention for the top spot in their Champions League group.

The scoreless draw between Newcastle United and Borussia Dortmund was a captivating tactical battle. While Dortmund dominated possession and attempted more shots, Newcastle’s resolute defense, spearheaded by Botman, Burn, and Pope, frustrated their attacking endeavors. 

The contrasting styles were evident in the passing statistics, with Dortmund favoring quick transitions and Newcastle prioritizing methodical build-up play. The midfield battle saw young star Bellingham orchestrate attacks for Dortmund, while Guimarães effectively countered his influence for Newcastle. 

Despite substitutions from both managers, neither side managed to break the deadlock. Ultimately, the draw held different significance for each team. For Newcastle, it was a point gained against a European giant, solidifying their defensive prowess. 

For Dortmund, it was a point dropped but one that kept them in contention for the group stage top spot. The underlying statistics further paint a picture of a tightly contested match, with Dortmund’s slightly more aggressive approach countered by Newcastle’s effective defensive strategy.

To read more, Click here

About the author

Vishwajeet

Add Comment

Get in touch

Content and images available on this website is supplied by contributors. As such we do not hold or accept liability for the content, views or references used. For any complaints please contact babumanish.kuwar@gmail.com. Use of this website signifies your agreement to our terms of use. We do our best to ensure that all information on the Website is accurate. If you find any inaccurate information on the Website please us know by sending an email to babumanish.kuwar@gmail.com and we will correct it, where we agree, as soon as practicable. We do not accept liability for any user-generated or user submitted content – if there are any copyright violations please notify us at babumanish.kuwar@gmail.com – any media used will be removed providing proof of content ownership can be provided. For any DMCA requests under the digital millennium copyright act Please contact: babumanish.kuwar@gmail.com with the subject DMCA Request.